Comments on: Ron’s Total Resolve Revisited

By: Kirrily XPKG

Kirrily XPKG — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:58:15 +0000

Yeah – she is a piece of work all right. I personally think she is the more devious one when it comes to money. I think Ronnie boy is whipped. Not only by his own sick mind, but his sick wifey as well.

By: AggieAtheist

AggieAtheist — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:49:31 +0000

Funny, I used to feel sorry for the silent second witness. Consistently throughout 2008 when I was running WeinlandWatch, ex-PKG members would tell me, "Don't be." Apparently the missus is quite the piece of work, at least according to hearsay from insiders......

By: Kirrily XPKG

Kirrily XPKG — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:02:10 +0000

Yeah, I remember all that ‘liquidate now’ stuff he used to say alright. “Where is your resolve? How much do you REALLY believe all this anyway?” blah f**&&&^# blah.

Looney, looney, looney – including Laura. She is JUST as bad as ronnie boy.

By: AggieAtheist

AggieAtheist — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:33:38 +0000

"Hypocrisy. I hate hypocrisy. I loathe hypocrisy." Hear hear! In re: the house in Erie that was built by church labour, the commenter also responded here to the allegations, and I do believe the same commenter initially revealed this on the old discussion thread on the Ironwolf blog, which I can't find the link for off-hand. But do read the comments on this post they are indeed interesting, and may shed more light on the matter.

By: Mike (DDTFA)

Mike (DDTFA) — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:42:12 +0000

On two occasions he said that’s what he was going to do. Indications strongly suggest he never quite got around to actually doing it.

I can’t say it’s a slam dunk that he didn’t pull some equity out. But under the circumstances, why did he put so much equity in the house in the first place? Well, he explains that when he bought the house he didn’t realize that he was going to be a Witness. Yeah, right. He bought the house in the spring of 2005 and by the end of the year made his Witness claim. He had sermons in 2004 talking about the Two Witnesses.

And let’s say that he has a good argument for not knowing he was a Witness. Then why is it that in 2006 when he told his followers to liquidate that he didn’t do the same? Back in 2006, credit was easy to get. Do what I say, not what I don’t.

Hypocrisy. I hate hypocrisy. I loathe hypocrisy.

By: J

Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:49:43 +0000

So did Ron say 100% that he did refinance or that it was something he was going to do? Exposing him as a liar, is this a slam dunk?