Comments on: Time Is Up

By: Richard

Richard — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:05:13 +0000

As there is so much confusion over when Weinland stated such and such “seal” or “trumpet” or “thunder” was to, or had occurred, it is painfully evident (to a casual observer) that the man could not restrain himself to a lucid time line and was often self contradictory. I do not see any value in arguing over what an obvious charlatan said, or the order in which he said it. ALL the bathwater can be thrown out, and if it contains the baby of Weinlands misplaced “seals and trumpets”, all the better.
My biggest concern is for the people who continue to believe in this man (Weinland) despite all of the evidence that shows him to be a false prophet. As a believer in Christ Jesus, I believe the false doctrine Weinland teaches casts dispersions upon the nature of Jesus, and this more than anything might cause some to fall to where they shall not be received by God.
Ronald Weinland is a sheep in wolves clothing, and a liar. And the fact that I can call him this with impunity is proof that he is not one of the “two witnesses”: as fire has not proceeded from his mouth to destroy me (or anyone else that has come against him for that matter)\
Revelation 11:5 And if any man will hurt them, fire proceedeth out of their mouth, and devoureth their enemies: and if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed.

Look in your Strongs Concordance to see the meaning of the word “hurt” in the above scripture. It is not limited to a physical act, but II would gladly slap Weinland in the face to prove my point, should I be given the opportunity. Perhaps by doing so someone could be saved from believing in this liar.

By: AggieAtheist

AggieAtheist — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:49:51 +0000

And no response. Why am I not surprised?

By: AggieAtheist

AggieAtheist — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:42:19 +0000

Weinland Observer says:
July 20, 2009 at 20:57

“I will read the links. If I am proven wrong it won’t be painful. I will just be wrong. That will be that.”

Well, WO? Have you read the links? What say you of BI now?

By: DRMR

DRMR — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:28:46 +0000

Weinland Observer says:
July 20, 2009 at 16:22
“I did read the two above comments. I know what to believe and what not to believe along with when I should believe it and when I shouldn’t.”

How telling!

By: Whisper

Whisper — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:31:37 +0000

It could easily be a bit of the “talk” that was left out but… it would seem that Weinland did not reveal to the Idea-City people that he himself was indeed a Witness as written in the book of Revelation within the Bible(s).
Why is that?
Run out of time or didn’t want to overload the crowd with so many titles that Ron wears?
Focused on himself being a Prophet, but Rons view of himself is bigger than that. Being a prophet would only make him of equal rank to some of the other WWCoG splinter leaders whom call themeselves prophets as well, but being a Witness…
Why leave this part out?